Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv6 0/10] kexec: extend kexec hypercall for use with pv-ops kernels

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 26.06.13 at 11:44, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 25/06/13 20:27, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> Please prepare next version of these patches and repost with
>> kexec-tools patches. They are integral part of new Xen kexec
>> implementation and it is worth to review both patch series together.
> 
> The kexec-tools patches haven't changed and I don't see any merit in
> reposting them until the Xen patches are applied.

So what if we apply the Xen patches, and then you're asked to
do changes to the tools ones, requiring adjustments to the
interface? Or if the tools side patches get rejected altogether?
There certainly ought to be some mutual agreement that both
will get applied in a certain (final) shape...

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel