[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] nested virtualizaiton test report for Xen 4.3-RC1
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Ren, Yongjie <yongjie.ren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi All, > This the a nested virtualization test report for Xen 4.3-RC1 on Intel > hardware. We use Linux 3.9.1 as Dom0. > a. Virtual EPT and VMCS shadowing features can work fine. > b. Xen, KVM and VMware can basically work on top of L0 Xen. > c. 32bit/64bit Linux and Windows are covered as L2 guests. Sorry I just saw this -- thanks for the nice enumeration. Two questions. First, I don't see the Win7 "XP compatibility mode" on this list -- that would be L0 Xen, L1 Win7, L2 XP. This seems like probably the most likely actual real-world use of nested virt. Is that on your radar at all? Secondly, what do you think is the primary use case for Xen-on-Xen (or KVM-on-Xen, &c)? Who would want to use it and why? Thanks, -George > > There are three basic entities in Xen nested virtualization. > L0: Xen (64bit Xen and 64bit Dom0), which is at the bottom of the > nested stack. > L1: Xen or KVM or VMware or VirtualBox (all in 64bit mode) > L2: Linux or Windows guest, which is at the top of the nested stack. > (when saying 'KVM on Xen', I mean L0 hypervisor is Xen and L1 hypervisor is > KVM.) > > Workable cases: (Pass) > 1. virtual EPT and VMCS shadowing feature enabled > 2. 64bit Linux/Windows as L2 guest for "Xen on Xen" > 3. 64bit Linux guest as L2 guest for "KVM on Xen" > 4. L1 KVM and L1 Xen simultaneously running on a L0 Xen > 5. L2 guest Save/Restore and local migration for "KVM on Xen" > 6. AVX and XSAVE in L2 guest for "KVM on Xen" > 7. some workloads (e.g. LTP, Kernel-build, UnixBench) can work fine in 64bit > L2 Linux guest > 8. 64bit Linux L2 guest can boot up for "VMware on Xen" > 9. 32bit L2 guest (Linux/Windows) booting on "Xen on Xen" (not use EPT in L1) > 10. 32bit/64bit Windows and 32bit Linux L2 guest booting on "VMware on Xen" > (not use EPT in L1) > N.B. Only if you don't use EPT feature in L1 hypervisor, case #9 and #10 can > work fine. > > Non-workable cases: (Fail) > 1. 32bit/64bit Windows L2 guest booting on "KVM on Xen" > 2. L2 guest Save/Restore and local migration for "Xen on Xen" > 3. Migration "from L0 to L1" for "Xen on Xen" > 4. Migration "from L1 to L0" for "Xen on Xen" > 5. Migration a L1 Xen/KVM guest with a L2 running in that L1 > 6. L2 guest booting on "VirtualBox on Xen" > > > Best Regards, > Yongjie (Jay) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |