Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks

[Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/07/2013 12:15 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 08/07/2013 10:18 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > tip:master is not a stable branch; it is more like linux-next.  We need
> > to figure out which topic branches are dependencies for this set.
> Okay. I 'll start looking at the branches that would get affected.
> (Xen, kvm are obvious ones).
> Please do let me know the branches I might have to check for.
On Linus tree,
I am seeing patch getting applied to arch/x86/Kconfig at some offset

Hunk #1 succeeded at 632 (offset -31 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 657 (offset -31 lines).

since patches are based on -rc4, Xen, kvm should not have problem
as pointed by Gleb, Konrad.
I did not see change in tip's jumplabel/core-spinlock tree that would
affect it.

Peter, could you please point me to the conflict, so that I can help
there which saves time and trouble to maintainers.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel