Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.4 development update

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 12.08.13 at 20:55, Daniel Kiper <dkiper@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:06:08AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 09.08.13 at 22:01, Daniel Kiper <dkiper@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >   - unmodified_drivers should be removed because as I know
>> >     they are not maintained for very long time; if you
>> >     agree I could do that,
>>
>> The most recent update to them was on 2013-02-12, so not all
>> _that_ long ago. We're still using them, so I'd hope that they
>> could stay in the tree, saving us from having to patch them back
>> in.
> 
> As I understood from [1] unmodified_drivers is not maintained.
> However, if you found out that it was updated quite recently then
> I do not insist on removing it.
> 
> 1) http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-06/msg00730.html 

What I said there has nothing to do with the maintenance status
of the unmodified_drivers/ subtree; instead, it is related to the
need to also have a suitable forward ported Linux tree to build
them against.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel