Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.4 development update

[Daniel Kiper <dkiper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 12.08.13 at 20:55, Daniel Kiper <dkiper@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:06:08AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 09.08.13 at 22:01, Daniel Kiper <dkiper@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >   - unmodified_drivers should be removed because as I know
> >> >     they are not maintained for very long time; if you
> >> >     agree I could do that,
> >>
> >> The most recent update to them was on 2013-02-12, so not all
> >> _that_ long ago. We're still using them, so I'd hope that they
> >> could stay in the tree, saving us from having to patch them back
> >> in.
> >
> > As I understood from [1] unmodified_drivers is not maintained.
> > However, if you found out that it was updated quite recently then
> > I do not insist on removing it.
> >
> > 1) http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-06/msg00730.html
>
> What I said there has nothing to do with the maintenance status
> of the unmodified_drivers/ subtree; instead, it is related to the
> need to also have a suitable forward ported Linux tree to build
> them against.

It looks that I understood your email in wrong way.
Thanks for clarification.

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel