Re: [Xen-devel] [V10 PATCH 23/23] PVH xen: introduce vmexit handler for PVH

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 23.08.13 at 01:22, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In general, we should have less interecepts for PVH, eg, there should
> be no MSR_IA32_CR_PAT intercept.

How that? All memory management supposedly is HVM-like, and
PAT is an integral part of memory management. Unless I'm
mistaken, not intercepting PAT writes would mean you allow the
guest access to the physical MSR, which surely is wrong.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel