|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] Nested VMX: Clear bit 31 of IA32_VMX_BASIC MSR
Andrew Cooper wrote on 2013-09-05:
> On 05/09/13 03:57, Yang Zhang wrote:
>> From: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The bit 31 of revision_id will set to 1 if vmcs shadowing enabled.
>> And according intel SDM, the bit 31 of IA32_VMX_BASIC MSR is always
>> 0. So we cannot set low 32 bit of IA32_VMX_BASIC to revision_id directly.
>> Must clear the bit 31 to 0.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
>> b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c index 2e0b7f7..8571002 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
>> @@ -1846,7 +1846,7 @@ int nvmx_msr_read_intercept(unsigned int msr,
> u64 *msr_content)
>> switch (msr) {
>> case MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC:
>> data = (host_data & (~0ul << 32)) |
>> - ((v->arch.hvm_vmx.vmcs)->vmcs_revision_id);
>> + ((v->arch.hvm_vmx.vmcs)->vmcs_revision_id & ~(1ul <<
>> + 31));
>
> What are the chances of vmcs_revision_id extending beyond 32 bits?
>
> The SDM states that the bottom 31 bits of IA32_VMX_BASIC shall be the
> bottom 31 bits of the revision id, so
>
> (v->arch.hvm_vmx.vmcs->vmcs_revision_id & 0x7fffffff);
>
> would seem more obvious. Also, the brackets were superfluous.
Right!
>
> ~Andrew
>
>> break;
>> case MSR_IA32_VMX_PINBASED_CTLS:
>> case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PINBASED_CTLS:
Best regards,
Yang
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |