Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Fix NULL pointer dereference in ARINC653 free_vdata.

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 04.11.13 at 11:46, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/11/13 23:01, Nate Studer wrote:
>> Just to make sure, and to avoid needlessly filling George's inbox, Robbie 
>> (The
>> other ARINC653 scheduler maintainer) should usually be the one acking patches
>> like this, correct?
> 
> I'm not sure exactly what the policy would be here -- I think the "need 
> an ack from someone else" rule is primarily for committers to commit 
> their own patches.  If you're just submitting it, as a maintainer, it 
> seems like having the committer look over it (and being satisfied that 
> the community has had a chance to comment) should be enough, and needing 
> an extra Ack from the other committer is a bit over-kill, particularly 
> in this case.
> 
> But I could be wrong about that. :-)

My understanding is the same.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel