[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/12] xenctx: Clean up stack trace when hypercall_page not in symbol table
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 08:47 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 07.11.13 at 09:22, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 08:07 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> And a note on patch submission: You send _to_ the list, and _cc_ > >> maintainers and other relevant people (without stretching the > >> meaning of "relevant" too much). > > > > Do we need such a rule? Why is it useful? > > > > I personally don't mind which field causes the mail to arrive in my > > INBOX. I suppose you filter "To: xen-devel; Cc: Jan" differently to "To: > > Jan; Cc: xen-devel"? > > Exactly. Mails Cc-ed to me get treated almost equally to all other > xen-devel traffic, whereas mails directed at me mean to me that > a response or other kind of action is expected. Basically the > usual (common sense?) email rules... > > So maybe I was too strict about the maintainer part - I don't mind > being sent mails to me that fall under the areas I'm maintainer of, > since there I'm obviously requested to take some sort of action. > But in the case here I certainly feel it was wrong to send the > whole series _to_ everyone. Ah, yes that makes sense, I hadn't noticed that bit. > > http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Submitting_Xen_Patches#Cc_the_maintainer_of_ > > > > the_code_you_are_modifying is confusingly worded and somewhat > > contradictory, > > in that it initially requests to send to the maintainer and then later to > > cc > > them. As I say, I don't think it really matters which but if you care then > > it > > would be useful to clarify the wording there. > > Yes, I think we should. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |