Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7 of 7 V4] tools/libxl: refactor domain_suspend_callback code to be fully asynchronous

[Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Shriram Rajagopalan writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7 of 7 V4] tools/libxl: 
> refactor domain_suspend_callback code to be fully asynchronous"):
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Shriram Rajagopalan
>> <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > # HG changeset patch
>> > # User Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > # Date 1384492684 28800
>> > # Node ID c9b550e435d8dce5302e77609849bf007b4f3c2e
>> > # Parent  6a2a1bfffc666d5c7aaaa3532c709f2e38a86d05
>> > tools/libxl: refactor domain_suspend_callback code to be fully asynchronous
>> >
>> > libxl__domain_suspend_callback_common uses usleep calls,
>> > while the caller libxl_domain_suspend_callback is asynchronous.
>> > This patch refactors the libxl__domain_suspend__common code to use
>> > AO facilities like libxl event loop timers instead of usleep calls.
> ...
>> Ian, would you like this to be lumped together with your patch on
>> asynchronous domain suspend, and sent out as a separate patch
>> series?
>
> If you'd like to see it in 4.4, yes, please.  I suspect that your full
> Remus series isn't going to make it, I'm afraid.

Why? I had posted three versions these way before the freeze date (oct 18).
And the final feedback I had on the Remus series was to make the
checkpoint sleep function use event timers, which has been addressed in V4.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel