[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 21375: regressions - FAIL
>>> On 18.11.13 at 18:18, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > An other update, > > we had the idee of trying this on earlier versin of Xen, and it turns > out that Xen 4.3 works fine. One bisect later, and a commit turns out. > > commit 86781624f8df1d50eb4185cfc2ddce926798f7aa > x86_emulate: PUSH <mem> must read source operand just once > ... for the case of accessing MMIO. > > So after this commit, syslinux stop working correctly with the last > version of QEMU. This happen if QEMU is calling track_dirty_vram. > > I also have use xentrace/xenalyze to try to grab more information about > the issue, it did not really help, but it's tell me that the guest is > stock on a specific instruction (it result in vmexit EPT_VIOLATION over > and over on xentrace). And that were the guest is stock: > > 0xa126: mov %eax,%cr0 > 0xa129: ljmp $0xf2e,$0xa12e > 0xa130: mov $0x26,%dl > 0xa132: or %bh,(%eax) > 0xa134: movzww %sp,%sp > 0xa138: mov %edx,%ds > 0xa13a: mov %edx,%es > 0xa13c: mov %edx,%fs > 0xa13e: mov %edx,%gs > 0xa140: jmp *%ebx > 0xa142: pushf > => 0xa143: lcall *%cs:(%si) > 0xa147: mov $0x0,%ch > > Before trying on earlier version of Xen, I try to understand what when > wrong on the Xen side, it turn out that, in the track_dirty_vram > hypercall, a call to hap_enable_log_dirty() is all that needed to break > the guest. > > Jan, any idee of what the issue is? Oh, indeed, I screwed this up without noticing. Please try the attached patch. Jan Attachment:
x86-emul-far-call.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |