Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 11/14] libxl: get and set soft affinity

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH v3 11/14] libxl: get and set soft affinity"):
> On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 13:59 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> > Just to be clear -- if we bump the API number, then we have to do some 
> > #ifdef-ery to allow programs compiled against the old API to compile, right?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> I expect that the libxl_domain_create_restore machinery is the template
> which would be desired here.
> 
> This does not remove the need for a LIBXL_HAVE_FOO either -- they are
> somewhat orthogonal. (In practice at least libvirt prefers the
> LIBXL_HAVE mechanism)

For the record, I don't object to this approach, if that's what George
and Ian C prefer.  I agree that the profusion of variants is ugly.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel