[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 11/14] libxl: get and set soft affinity

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH v3 11/14] libxl: get and set soft affinity"):
> On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 13:59 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> > Just to be clear -- if we bump the API number, then we have to do some 
> > #ifdef-ery to allow programs compiled against the old API to compile, right?
> Yes.
> I expect that the libxl_domain_create_restore machinery is the template
> which would be desired here.
> This does not remove the need for a LIBXL_HAVE_FOO either -- they are
> somewhat orthogonal. (In practice at least libvirt prefers the
> LIBXL_HAVE mechanism)

For the record, I don't object to this approach, if that's what George
and Ian C prefer.  I agree that the profusion of variants is ugly.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.