Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 11/14] libxl: get and set soft affinity

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On mer, 2013-11-20 at 16:59 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH v3 11/14] libxl: get and set soft affinity"):
> > I expect that the libxl_domain_create_restore machinery is the template
> > which would be desired here.
> > 
> > This does not remove the need for a LIBXL_HAVE_FOO either -- they are
> > somewhat orthogonal. (In practice at least libvirt prefers the
> > LIBXL_HAVE mechanism)
> 
> For the record, I don't object to this approach, if that's what George
> and Ian C prefer.  I agree that the profusion of variants is ugly.
> 
Fine then. Going for it.

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel