[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/5] tmem: Pointless check of NULL against an array
>>> On 25.11.13 at 20:54, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:19:32PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 25/11/13 17:00, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> > CID 1055632 tells us that we are comparing an array to a NULL >> > which is indeed silly. Lets not do it. >> > >> > CC: Bob Liu <bob.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > xen/common/tmem.c | 2 -- >> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/xen/common/tmem.c b/xen/common/tmem.c >> > index 3bc35fd..1ebed8a 100644 >> > --- a/xen/common/tmem.c >> > +++ b/xen/common/tmem.c >> > @@ -1798,8 +1798,6 @@ static int do_tmem_destroy_pool(uint32_t pool_id) >> > struct client *client = tmem_client_from_current(); >> > struct tmem_pool *pool; >> > >> > - if ( client->pools == NULL ) >> > - return 0; >> >> client->pools certainly can't be null, but client certainly can. This >> should be "if ( !client )" > > No need. The caller of this function does that already and if there > does not exist one - it will create one. > > I can add an ASSERT here? Yes. Or just pass the already validated "client" into the function. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |