[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: introduce an option for disabling the non-O_DIRECT workaround [and 1 more messages]
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: introduce an option for
disabling the non-O_DIRECT workaround [and 1 more messages]"):
> But maybe the tristate is a reasonable suggestion.
I remember why we didn't do this. We could implement
no-direct-io-safe
or something, but it wouldn't be always effective. It would only
work for the bits of the system that we can prevent from doing
O_DIRECT.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
