Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 24250: tolerable FAIL

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 12:29 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.01.14 at 10:36, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > flight 24250 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/ 
> > 
> > Failures :-/ but no regressions.
> > 
> > Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
> >  test-armhf-armhf-xl           7 debian-install               fail   like 
> > 24146
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1  7 windows-install          fail like 
> > 23938
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64  7 windows-install              fail  like 
> > 24146
> 
> These windows-install failures have been pretty persistent for
> the last month or two. I've been looking at the logs from the
> hypervisor side a number of times without spotting anything. It'd
> be nice to know whether anyone also did so from the tools and
> qemu sides... In any event we will need to do something about
> this before 4.4 goes out.

http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg

says that Windows experienced an unexpected error.

http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/24250/test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1/win.guest.osstest--vnc.jpeg

is a blue screen "BAD_POOL_CALLER".

I think this is unlikely to be a toolstack thing, but as to whether it
is a Xen or a Windows issue I wouldn't like to say. I had a look through
the toolstack logs anyway and didn't see anything untoward.
> Jan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel