[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] global keymap= option not recognized
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 14:39 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:59:44AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:52 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:04:51AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 18:34 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 04:51:40PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 17:46 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > > > > > With xm it was possible to have a global keymap="de" to map the > > > > > > > physical > > > > > > > keybard correctly. Now with xl this fails, at least in xen-4.3. > > > > > > > xl create -d shows keymap:NULL in the vfb part. > > > > > > > Only moving keymap= into vfb=[] fixes it for me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > xl.cfg(5) indicates that keymap= can be specified as global > > > > > > > option (just > > > > > > > like vnc=) as well as suboption for vbf=[]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Was this already fixed in xen-unstable? git log shows not keymap > > > > > > > related > > > > > > > changes. > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think Wei covered this one with his VNC patches. It does > > > > > > sound > > > > > > like it should be move though, yes. I think this is 4.5 material at > > > > > > this > > > > > > point. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're right, my patch didn't cover that aspect because I tried hard > > > > > to > > > > > make it minimal. > > > > > > > > Do you think you could revisit this bit for 4.5? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I think so. That should be relatively straightfoward, I hope. :-) > > > > > > > > > Wei, BTW, did you VNC change not require any doc (e.g. manpage) > > > > > > updates? > > > > > > Sorry for not thinking of that during review. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think so. All VNC / VFB options are already documented. > > > > > > > > The top level vnc*= options seem to be under "Emulated VGA Graphics > > > > Device" though. > > > > > > > > > > How about this > > > > HRM, I was more thinking about pulling those options out into a new > > "Primary Graphics Device" or something section with a little intro blurb > > about how for PV this is a PVFB and for HVM this is an emulated VNC. > > > > With your approach I think at a minimum it would need to enumerate which > > specific options work for both. > > > > From 935b18da7a9cf60186a87dcf97d39722d0e49937 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:48:13 +0000 > Subject: [PATCH] docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5: document global VNC options for VFB > device > > Update xl.cfg to reflect change in 706d4ab74 "xl: create VFB for PV > guest when VNC is specified". > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> I still think this is inferior to a proper refactoring but it's better than nothing so, Acked + applied. RM hat: barrier to docs improvements is very low. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |