[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] initial ballooning amount on HVM+PoD



>>> On 17.01.14 at 17:08, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 16:03 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> max_pfn/num_physpages isn't that far off for guest with less than
>> 4Gb, the number calculated from the PoD data is a little worse.
> 
> On ARM RAM may not start at 0 and so using max_pfn can be very
> misleading and in practice causes arm to balloon down to 0 as fast as it
> can.

Ugly. Is that only due to the temporary workaround for there not
being an IOMMU?

And short of the initial value needing to be architecture specific -
can you see a calculation that would yield a decent result on ARM
that would also be suitable on x86?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.