[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] initial ballooning amount on HVM+PoD
>>> On 17.01.14 at 17:08, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 16:03 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: >> max_pfn/num_physpages isn't that far off for guest with less than >> 4Gb, the number calculated from the PoD data is a little worse. > > On ARM RAM may not start at 0 and so using max_pfn can be very > misleading and in practice causes arm to balloon down to 0 as fast as it > can. Ugly. Is that only due to the temporary workaround for there not being an IOMMU? And short of the initial value needing to be architecture specific - can you see a calculation that would yield a decent result on ARM that would also be suitable on x86? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |