Re: [Xen-devel] Source tree tidy

[Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 04:18:49PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 12:20 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 04/03/14 06:27, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > >> The signed tags cover 4.1.0-rc1 thru 4.2.0-rc4, missing the releases
> > >> themselves, so are not particularly interesting to verify.
> > > Since the release (and therefore sigs) would have been made on the
> > > X.Y-testing.hg tree perhaps the release tags will be in the release
> > > branch version of the file? Although maybe the original hg->git
> > > conversion didn't pick that up?
> > 
> > They have indeed, and the 4.1 and 4.2 trees have further signatures in
> > them.  4.3, 4.4 and unstable hg trees all have the same set of sigs,
> > which do not include the releases.
> 
> Perhaps this is an artefact of the git->hg translation used on 4.3
> onwards, i..e it only picks up the sigs which are visible from the
> master branch. Perhaps Anthony knows, although I'm not sure how much
> effort it is worth expending here...

That's correct, if the tags was not in master, it won't be visible, like
any other files.

Also, I tryied to look at exporting tags from git to hg, it was a bit to
complicated, because it required a commit in hg that does not exist in
git.

-- 
Anthony PERARD

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel