Re: [Xen-devel] Please review the key 4.4 release docs

[Russell Pavlicek <russell.pavlicek@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I just updated http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Release_Features so that 4.4 
now pretty much mirrors 4.3.

I'd appreciate anyone who can run through the 4.4 column to check to see if 
those values are, in fact, correct.

Thanks,

Russ Pavlicek
Xen Project Evangelist, Citrix Systems
Home Office: +1-301-829-5327
Mobile: +1-240-397-0199
UK VoIP: +44 1223 852 894
________________________________________
From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] on 
behalf of Russell Pavlicek [russell.pavlicek@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 6:42 AM
To: George Dunlap; Zhang, Yang Z; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Please review the key 4.4 release docs

My thanks to those who have made adjustments to the docs so far.

One note which still needs clarification is this comment about ARM in 
http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_4.4_Feature_List :
> [TODO: clarify whether support has moved from tech preview to experimental or 
> supported]

So what is is the status of Xen Project on ARM?

Thanks,

Russ Pavlicek
Xen Project Evangelist, Citrix Systems
Home Office: +1-301-829-5327
Mobile: +1-240-397-0199
UK VoIP: +44 1223 852 894
________________________________________
From: George Dunlap [george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 5:54 AM
To: Zhang, Yang Z; Russell Pavlicek; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Please review the key 4.4 release docs

On 03/10/2014 04:27 AM, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Russell Pavlicek wrote on 2014-03-10:
>> I have done my best to compile the various key release documents for
>> the 4.4 release.
>>
>> All have hyperlinks from the download page:
>> http://www.xenproject.org/downloads/xen-archives/supported-xen-44-seri
>> es/ xen-440.html
> I thought that we have agreed that we will move the nested virtualization 
> from experimental to 1.0 or something else in Xen 4.4 release note. But it 
> seems it still in experimental state and there is no mention of it in the 
> release note.

Well we discussed it, but there were too many things still missing to
call it a properly supported feature: in particular, doubts about how
well shadow-on-hap would work, which would be a potential security
issue.  (On my to-do list is to collect these somewhere so we have a
clear set of criteria for moving nested HVM from "tech preview" to
"supported".)

It would be good to put something in the release note, however, to say
how much it has progressed.  I'll see what I can do.

  -George


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel