Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: Control CR0 TS behavior using dev_na_ts_allowed

[George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The naming of this (here and elsewhere) is rather odd: I assume
> you mean "dev_na" to be an abbreviation of "device not available",
> but I'd much prefer the CPU exception abbreviation (#NM) to be
> used in such a case. However, in the case here this still wouldn't
> be a precise description of the behavior you establish: TS being
> set isn't allowed, but required to be set upon guest #NM. I'd
> therefore suggest naming this along the lines of "nm_enforce_ts".

nm_hardware_ts, perhaps, since the TS is mimicking the native hardware
interface?

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel