[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] xen/libxc: Allow changes to hypervisor CPUID leaf from config file
>>> On 19.03.14 at 10:27, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 20:58 -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> Currently only "real" cpuid leaves can be overwritten by users via >> 'cpuid' option in the configuration file. This patch provides ability to >> do the same for hypervisor leaves (but for now only 0x40000000 is allowed). >> >> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c | 71 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> xen/arch/x86/domain.c | 19 +++++++++-- >> xen/arch/x86/traps.c | 3 ++ >> xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h | 7 +++++ >> 4 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c >> index bbbf9b8..5501d5b 100644 >> --- a/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c >> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c >> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ >> #define DEF_MAX_INTELEXT 0x80000008u >> #define DEF_MAX_AMDEXT 0x8000001cu >> >> +#define IS_HYPERVISOR_LEAF(idx) (((idx) & 0xffff0000) == 0x40000000) > > Not idx == 0x40000000? > > Also as I think Jan said before if viridian support is enabled then the > Xen leaves may be elsewhere (at 0x100 increments above that address > IIRC). But that's exactly why the low 16 bits should be masked off in above comparison. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |