Re: [Xen-devel] Xen-unstable Linux 3.14-rc3 and 3.13 Network troubles "bisected"

[Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sander Eikelenboom [mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 26 March 2014 19:57
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Wei Liu; annie li; Zoltan Kiss; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ian Campbell; 
> linux-
> kernel; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen-unstable Linux 3.14-rc3 and 3.13 Network
> troubles "bisected"
> 
> 
> Wednesday, March 26, 2014, 6:48:15 PM, you wrote:
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Paul Durrant
> >> Sent: 26 March 2014 17:47
> >> To: 'Sander Eikelenboom'
> >> Cc: Wei Liu; annie li; Zoltan Kiss; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ian Campbell;
> linux-
> >> kernel; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-unstable Linux 3.14-rc3 and 3.13 Network
> >> troubles "bisected"
> >>
> >> Re-send shortened version...
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Sander Eikelenboom [mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> > Sent: 26 March 2014 16:54
> >> > To: Paul Durrant
> >> > Cc: Wei Liu; annie li; Zoltan Kiss; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ian 
> >> > Campbell;
> >> linux-
> >> > kernel; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen-unstable Linux 3.14-rc3 and 3.13 Network
> >> > troubles "bisected"
> >> >
> >> [snip]
> >> > >>
> >> > >> - When processing an SKB we end up in "xenvif_gop_frag_copy"
> while
> >> > prod
> >> > >> == cons ... but we still have bytes and size left ..
> >> > >> - start_new_rx_buffer() has returned true ..
> >> > >> - so we end up in get_next_rx_buffer
> >> > >> - this does a RING_GET_REQUEST and ups cons ..
> >> > >> - and we end up with a bad grant reference.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Sometimes we are saved by the bell .. since additional slots have
> >> become
> >> > >> free (you see cons become > prod in "get_next_rx_buffer" but
> shortly
> >> > after
> >> > >> that prod is increased ..
> >> > >> just in time to not cause a overrun).
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> > > Ah, but hang on... There's a BUG_ON meta_slots_used >
> >> > max_slots_needed, so if we are overflowing the worst-case calculation
> >> then
> >> > why is that BUG_ON not firing?
> >> >
> >> > You mean:
> >> >                 sco = (struct skb_cb_overlay *)skb->cb;
> >> >                 sco->meta_slots_used = xenvif_gop_skb(skb, &npo);
> >> >                 BUG_ON(sco->meta_slots_used > max_slots_needed);
> >> >
> >> > in "get_next_rx_buffer" ?
> >> >
> >>
> >> That code excerpt is from net_rx_action(),isn't it?
> >>
> >> > I don't know .. at least now it doesn't crash dom0 and therefore not my
> >> > complete machine and since tcp is recovering from a failed packet  :-)
> >> >
> >>
> >> Well, if the code calculating max_slots_needed were underestimating
> then
> >> the BUG_ON() should fire. If it is not firing in your case then this 
> >> suggests
> >> your problem lies elsewhere, or that meta_slots_used is not equal to the
> >> number of ring slots consumed.
> >>
> >> > But probably because "npo->copy_prod++" seems to be used for the
> frags
> >> ..
> >> > and it isn't added to  npo->meta_prod ?
> >> >
> >>
> >> meta_slots_used is calculated as the value of meta_prod at return (from
> >> xenvif_gop_skb()) minus the value on entry , and if you look back up the
> >> code then you can see that meta_prod is incremented every time
> >> RING_GET_REQUEST() is evaluated. So, we must be consuming a slot
> without
> >> evaluating RING_GET_REQUEST() and I think that's exactly what's
> >> happening... Right at the bottom of xenvif_gop_frag_copy() req_cons is
> >> simply incremented in the case of a GSO. So the BUG_ON() is indeed off
> by
> >> one.
> >>
> 
> > Can you re-test with the following patch applied?
> 
> >   Paul
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-
> netback/netback
> > index 438d0c0..4f24220 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> > @@ -482,6 +482,8 @@ static void xenvif_rx_action(struct xenvif *vif)
> 
> >         while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&vif->rx_queue)) != NULL) {
> >                 RING_IDX max_slots_needed;
> > +               RING_IDX old_req_cons;
> > +               RING_IDX ring_slots_used;
> >                 int i;
> 
> >                 /* We need a cheap worse case estimate for the number of
> > @@ -511,8 +513,12 @@ static void xenvif_rx_action(struct xenvif *vif)
> >                         vif->rx_last_skb_slots = 0;
> 
> >                 sco = (struct skb_cb_overlay *)skb->cb;
> > +
> > +               old_req_cons = vif->rx.req_cons;
> >                 sco->meta_slots_used = xenvif_gop_skb(skb, &npo);
> > -               BUG_ON(sco->meta_slots_used > max_slots_needed);
> > +               ring_slots_used = vif->rx.req_cons - old_req_cons;
> > +
> > +               BUG_ON(ring_slots_used > max_slots_needed);
> 
> >                 __skb_queue_tail(&rxq, skb);
> >         }
> 
> That blew pretty fast .. on that BUG_ON
> 

Good. That's what should have happened :-)

  Paul

> [  290.218182] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  290.225425] kernel BUG at drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c:664!
> [  290.232717] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> [  290.239875] Modules linked in:
> [  290.246923] CPU: 0 PID: 10447 Comm: vif7.0 Not tainted 3.13.6-20140326-
> nbdebug35+ #1
> [  290.254040] Hardware name: MSI MS-7640/890FXA-GD70 (MS-7640)  , BIOS
> V1.8B1 09/13/2010
> [  290.261313] task: ffff880055d16480 ti: ffff88004cb7e000 task.ti:
> ffff88004cb7e000
> [  290.268713] RIP: e030:[<ffffffff81780430>]  [<ffffffff81780430>]
> xenvif_rx_action+0x1650/0x1670
> [  290.276193] RSP: e02b:ffff88004cb7fc28  EFLAGS: 00010202
> [  290.283555] RAX: 0000000000000006 RBX: ffff88004c630000 RCX:
> 3fffffffffffffff
> [  290.290908] RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: ffff88004c630940 RDI:
> 0000000000048e7b
> [  290.298325] RBP: ffff88004cb7fde8 R08: 0000000000007bc9 R09:
> 0000000000000005
> [  290.305809] R10: ffff88004cb7fd28 R11: ffffc90012690600 R12:
> 0000000000000004
> [  290.313217] R13: ffff8800536a84e0 R14: 0000000000000001 R15:
> ffff88004c637618
> [  290.320521] FS:  00007f1d3030c700(0000) GS:ffff88005f600000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [  290.327839] CS:  e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> [  290.335216] CR2: ffffffffff600400 CR3: 0000000058537000 CR4:
> 0000000000000660
> [  290.342732] Stack:
> [  290.350129]  ffff88004cb7fd2c ffff880000000005 ffff88004cb7fd28
> ffffffff810f7fc8
> [  290.357652]  ffff880055d16b50 ffffffff00000407 ffff880000000000
> ffffffff00000000
> [  290.365048]  ffff880055d16b50 ffff880000000001 ffff880000000001
> ffffffff00000000
> [  290.372461] Call Trace:
> [  290.379806]  [<ffffffff810f7fc8>] ? __lock_acquire+0x418/0x2220
> [  290.387211]  [<ffffffff810df5f6>] ? finish_task_switch+0x46/0xf0
> [  290.394552]  [<ffffffff81781400>] xenvif_kthread+0x40/0x190
> [  290.401808]  [<ffffffff810f05e0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
> [  290.408993]  [<ffffffff817813c0>] ? xenvif_stop_queue+0x60/0x60
> [  290.416238]  [<ffffffff810d4f24>] kthread+0xe4/0x100
> [  290.423428]  [<ffffffff81b4cf30>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x50
> [  290.430615]  [<ffffffff810d4e40>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
> [  290.437793]  [<ffffffff81b4e13c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> [  290.444945]  [<ffffffff810d4e40>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
> [  290.452091] Code: fd ff ff 48 8b b5 f0 fe ff ff 48 c7 c2 10 98 ce 81 31 c0 
> 48 8b
> be c8 7c 00 00 48 c7 c6 f0 f1 fd 81 e8 35 be 24 00 e9 ba f8 ff ff <0f> 0b 0f 
> 0b 41
> bf 01 00 00 00 e9 55 f6 ff ff 0f 0b 66 66 66 66
> [  290.467121] RIP  [<ffffffff81780430>] xenvif_rx_action+0x1650/0x1670
> [  290.474436]  RSP <ffff88004cb7fc28>
> [  290.482400] ---[ end trace 2fcf9e9ae26950b3 ]---


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel