Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 25979: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 01.05.14 at 10:26, <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:10 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 25979: 
> regressions - FAIL"):
>> > On 25.04.14 at 13:46, <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > How long did the fourth boot take in 25794 I wonder?
>> > 
>> > 6247s (ran on lace-bug)
>> 
>> See my other email.  I think this is host-specific.  lace-bug is an
>> AMD machine.
>> 
>> I think perhaps this is a performance problem with SVM.
> 
> I don't think this is a new thing. I've heard speculation that this may
> have been the case since the page-sharing p2m locking changes way back
> in 4.2.
> 
> I've lost track of who at AMD I should be CCing with this mail -- Jan, I
> guess you know?

SVM maintainers - can one of you please take looking into this as
an action item?

Thanks, Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel