[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] domains being migrated state message improvements
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 14:24 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 02/05/14 14:16, Stefan Parvu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Can anyone comment and consider improving the way Xen kernel reports > > domains being migrated ? In short Im putting some load on 10-14 guests > > and I want to monitor things from dom0 via xentop. Im seeing strange > > things reported by xentop like '------' > > > > See entire thread here: > > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2014-05/msg00007.html > > > > > > Would be useful to have a proper message reported by xl list and xentop > > when domains are being migrated. Currently xentop and xl list reporting > > things like: > > > > xentop: > > > >> NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) > >> c5932 ------ 1066 53.1 > >> c5964 -----r 3439 50.7 > >> c6464 ------ 1067 50.3 > >> deb7464 ------ 630 52.1 > >> Domain-0 -----r 82853 111.5 > >> lobby ------ 1380 52.2 > >> r5732 ------ 12075 50.7 > >> r5764 -----r 24563 50.6 > >> s10u8 -----r 2647 47.6 > >> sdrcom -----r 1015 52.7 > >> sdrorg --b--- 154 0.0 > >> u100432 ------ 961 50.9 > >> u100464 -----r 978 52.2 > >> u120464 ------ 969 52.7 > >> win764 -----r 1328 72.7 > > > > xl list: > > > > Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) > > Domain-0 0 6500 2 r----- 87994.3 > > c5932 1 1024 1 r----- 8998.7 > > c5964 2 1024 1 ------ 6786.1 > > c6464 3 1024 1 r----- 1896.2 > > deb7464 4 1024 1 ------ 792.3 > > lobby 5 756 1 ------ 2403.7 > > r5732 6 1019 1 r----- 27343.8 > > r5764 7 1019 1 ------ 27140.4 > > s10u8 8 1019 1 r----- 3583.6 > > sdrcom 9 768 1 r----- 1852.4 > > sdrorg 10 768 1 -b---- 168.6 > > u100432 11 1024 1 ------ 15657.9 > > u100464 12 1024 1 r----- 1805.2 > > u120464 13 1024 1 r----- 1812.1 > > win764 15 1023 2 ------ 3131.6 > > > > > > Please consider enhancing the output and have proper logging of each domain > > for > > different conditions. Output like '------' is confusing and does not > > describe > > properly the things. Worse 3rd tools or consumers of xentop might break > > when receiving such output. > > > > Thanks, > > > > I would agree that it is a little confusing. '------' means runnable > but not running, in this case due to vcpu over subscription. Is that not "blocked"? BTW, the "migration" referred to here is VCPU migration to another PCPU rather than domain migration. (It came up because that's another one of the VCPU pause flags alongside blocked et al) > However, the information is stale by the time it is displayed. It is > not really appropriate to be consumed by anything other than an eyeball. Agreed. And even if someone disagrees I think it is up to those tools to accept whatever the output is, even if that includes "nonsensical" results. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |