[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 09/10] x86/hvm: Add SMAP support to HVM guest
>>> On 07.05.14 at 12:46, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/05/14 09:19, Feng Wu wrote: >> @@ -360,13 +362,26 @@ static inline bool_t hvm_vcpu_has_smep(void) >> >> hvm_cpuid(0, &eax, NULL, NULL, NULL); >> >> - if (eax < 7) >> + if ( eax < 7 ) >> return 0; >> >> hvm_cpuid(7, NULL, &ebx, NULL, NULL); >> return !!(ebx & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_SMEP)); >> } >> >> +static inline bool_t hvm_vcpu_has_smap(void) >> +{ >> + unsigned int eax, ebx; >> + >> + hvm_cpuid(0, &eax, NULL, NULL, NULL); >> + >> + if ( eax < 7 ) >> + return 0; >> + >> + hvm_cpuid(0x7, NULL, &ebx, NULL, NULL); > > I have just noticed a bug here and in hvm_vcpu_have_smep(). CPUID.0x7 > takes a count of 0 for the feature leaf. You should not rely on the > default value of dummy inside hvm_cpuid() for this call to work > correctly, so need to explicitly pass ecx. While I'm fine with this being made more explicit, I don't think it's a bug (not even a latent one) to rely on the default sub-leaf being zero. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |