Re: [Xen-devel] [V10 PATCH 0/4] pvh dom0 patches...

[Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 08 May 2014 07:37:21 +0100
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >>> On 08.05.14 at 02:04, <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 May 2014 08:50:16 +0100
> > "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> >>> On 07.05.14 at 03:00, <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > As Konrad points out, there are other issues with that part of
> >> > the code. So, IMO, we should wait and address that altogether
> >> > for both PV and PVH, and for now leave this as is.
> >> 
> >> I'm fine either way, as long as you and Roger can reach agreement.
> >> I still tend towards considering Roger's position the right one as
> >> a mid/long term route.
> > 
> > Ok, will let Roger drive that on xen, and I'll look at linux side.
> > But since his patch is incremental on top of mine, I find request
> > reasonable that my next version V12 be checked in if no issues, or
> > at least construct_dom0 patch which is sitting reviewed for over 6
> > months now. 
> 
> I would have long committed it if you had chased up Tim's ack on it.
> I'm not going to do that for you, there's enough other patches that
> need taking care of.

Oh, I didn't know thats what it was waiting for. anyways, looks like
he just acked it. So... new version on it's way (hopefully no regressions
on testing after refresh).

thanks for all your help,
mukesh


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel