[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V9 06/12] remus: implement the API for checkpoint
- To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Hongyang Yang <yanghy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:46:28 +0800
- Cc: ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx, wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx, eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rshriram@xxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 14 May 2014 01:49:04 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 04/24/2014 12:04 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Yang Hongyang writes ("[PATCH V9 06/12] remus: implement the API for
checkpoint"):
+_hidden int libxl__remus_device_postsuspend(libxl__remus_state *remus_state);
+_hidden int libxl__remus_device_preresume(libxl__remus_state *remus_state);
+_hidden int libxl__remus_device_commit(libxl__remus_state *remus_state);
This patch seems to introduce these functions with no callers. The
functions are then patched in a subsequent patch, again without any
callers. See my comments on the previous patch.
Hi Ian, these functions are called in patch 11. I will restructure the patch to
make it easy to review.(merge this func define and the caller)
Thanks,
Ian.
.
--
Thanks,
Yang.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
