[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v3 3/6] xen/arm: Add save/restore support for ARM arch timer
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 16:18 -0500, Wei Huang wrote: > This patch implements a save/resore support for ARM architecture "restore" > diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm/hvm/save.h > b/xen/include/public/arch-arm/hvm/save.h > index 421a6f6..8679bfd 100644 > --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm/hvm/save.h > +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm/hvm/save.h > @@ -72,10 +72,24 @@ struct hvm_arm_gich_v2 > }; > DECLARE_HVM_SAVE_TYPE(GICH_V2, 3, struct hvm_arm_gich_v2); > > +/* Two ARM timers (physical and virtual) are saved */ Do you not need to save CNTFRQ and CNTKCTL? > +#define ARM_TIMER_TYPE_VIRT 0 > +#define ARM_TIMER_TYPE_PHYS 1 > +#define ARM_TIMER_TYPE_COUNT 2 /* total count */ > + > +struct hvm_arm_timer > +{ > + uint64_t vtb_offset; As discussed elsewhere I don't think the offset is architectural state. This should be incorporated into the cval. Otherwise how does the receiver know what this is an offset from? > + uint32_t ctl; > + uint64_t cval; > + uint32_t type; > +}; > +DECLARE_HVM_SAVE_TYPE(TIMER, 4, struct hvm_arm_timer); Why not do DECLARE_HVM_SAVE_TYPE(VTIMER, 4, struct hvm_arm_timer) DECLARE_HVM_SAVE_TYPE(PTIMER, 5, struct hvm_arm_timer) and drop the type field? Or else define hvm_arm_timers with cntfeq, cntkctl and two sets of the ctl,cval in a single struct. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |