[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next] xen-netfront: try linearizing SKB if it occupies too many slots
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 08:22:19AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 15:36 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 07:21:08AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 14:11 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > > > > It's not that common to trigger this, I only saw a few reports. In fact > > > > Stefan's report is the first one that comes with a method to reproduce > > > > it. > > > > > > > > I tested with redis-benchmark on a guest with 256MB RAM and only saw a > > > > few "failed to linearize", never saw a single one with 1GB guest. > > > > > > Well, I am just saying. This is asking order-5 allocations, and yes, > > > this is going to fail after few days of uptime, no matter what you try. > > > > > > > Hmm... I see what you mean -- memory fragmentation leads to allocation > > failure. Thanks. > > In the mean time, have you tried to lower gso_max_size ? > > Setting it witk netif_set_gso_max_size() to something like 56000 might > avoid the problem. > > (Not sure if it is applicable in your case) > It works, at least in this Redis testcase. Could you explain a bit where this 56000 magic number comes from? :-) Presumably I can derive it from some constant in core network code? Wei. > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |