[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [v2][PATCH 4/8] xen, gfx passthrough: reserve 00:02.0 for INTEL IGD
> -----Original Message----- > From: Anthony PERARD [mailto:anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 10:45 PM > To: Chen, Tiejun > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann; stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; mst@xxxxxxxxxx; > Kelly.Zytaruk@xxxxxxx; peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx; > xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kay, Allen M; qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx; > anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Yang Z > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v2][PATCH 4/8] xen, gfx passthrough: reserve > 00:02.0 for INTEL IGD > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:04:14PM +0000, Chen, Tiejun wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Gerd Hoffmann [mailto:kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 7:23 PM > > > To: Chen, Tiejun > > > Cc: anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx; stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > > mst@xxxxxxxxxx; Kelly.Zytaruk@xxxxxxx; peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx; > > > xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kay, Allen M; qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx; > > > jean.guyader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Yang Z > > > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v2][PATCH 4/8] xen, gfx passthrough: > > > reserve > > > 00:02.0 for INTEL IGD > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > I think '-vga none' just guarantees the qemu vga cards doesn't > > > > occupy 00:02.0, but this doesn't mean others use this specific > > > > slot since in qemu internal, we always pass -1 to assign a slot > > > > automatically to register a PCI device. So in some cases, we can't > > > > get this slot as we expect since that is already assigned previously > > > > before > we need this. > > > > > > Yes, -vga, -net nic, -drive if=scsi (maybe more) can internally > > > create pci devices with auto slot assignment, which will occupy slot 2 > indeed. > > > Use -device instead to create the devices. > > > > > > > Are you saying we have to create the devices explicitly when we want to work > IGD vga with passthrough? But how to make sure all user know this workable > way? Maybe you suggest we should document somewhere. > > > > > > PCI: slot 2 function 0 not available for xen-pci-passthrough, in > > > > use by xen-platform > > > > > > Ah, the xen platform device. /me looks. Ah, pc_xen_hvm_init > > > creates this automatically. Two options here IMHO: > > > > > > (1) Just move it somewhere else explicitly. For example slot 3, or > > > make it a southbridge function (say 00:01.7). > > > (2) Don't create it automatically, instead expect management add it > > > if needed, using -device xen-plaform,addr=... > > > > > > I personally would suggest to go for #2. As far I know the platform > > > device is only needed if you want attach xenbus devices to the guest > > > (correct?), so creating virtual machines without the xen platform > > > device is a valid use case and you should allow it. > > > > > > > Looks you recommend we should change current xen platform design, I'm not > sure if something in libxl also need to be modified. Especially, this may not > be > compatible with those old xen version. And especially, how to guarantee no one > occupy 00:02.0 in the future with auto assign? > > Hi, > > Libxl knows how to create a guest without xen-platform, but I think this can > work only from QEMU 1.6 (which Xen 4.4 use). > > So, using the options below with libxl would put the xen-platform device away > from the 00:02 slot. > xen_platform_pci=0 > device_model_args_hvm = [ '-device', 'xen-platform,addr=0x3' ] > I added these two lines in domU's configuration file, but failed: tchen0@tchen0-linux:~/workspace$ sudo xl cr domu-cfg Parsing config from domu-cfg libxl: error: libxl_qmp.c:287:qmp_handle_error_response: received an error message from QMP server: Unsupported bus. Bus doesn't have property 'acpi-pcihp-bsel' set libxl: error: libxl_create.c:1277:domcreate_attach_pci: libxl_device_pci_add failed: -3 tchen0@tchen0-linux:~/workspace$ cat /var/log/xen/qemu-dm-HVM.log char device redirected to /dev/pts/49 (label serial0) qemu: terminating on signal 1 from pid 3117 Anything else I'm still missing? Or this mean this way can't work based on the latest qemu/xen? Thanks Tiejun _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |