[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 2/5] libxc/trace: Add xc_tbuf_set_cpu_mask_array a variant of xc_tbuf_set_cpu_mask (v3)

On 06/04/2014 05:45 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
On 06/04/2014 02:44 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
which uses an xc_cpumap_t instead of a uint32_t. This means
we can use an arbitrary bitmap without being limited to the
32-bits the xc_tbuf_set_cpu_mask_array can only do.

We also add an macro which can be used by both libxc and

Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
[v2: Use DIV_ROUND_UP macro as suggested by Daniel]
[v3: Use 'int' for bits instead of 'unsigned int' as spotted by Boris]

Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Oh, sorry -- I meant to say: from what I can tell, at the moment xentrace is the only user of xc_tbuf_set_cpu_mask(). The libxc interface isn't stable: why not just leave the name xc_tbuf_set_cpu_mask() and just change the arguments? (This would obviously involve merging patch 4 into this one as well.)


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.