Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 2/5] libxc/trace: Add xc_tbuf_set_cpu_mask_array a variant of xc_tbuf_set_cpu_mask (v3)

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 05:52:27PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 05:45 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> >On 06/04/2014 02:44 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>which uses an xc_cpumap_t instead of a uint32_t. This means
> >>we can use an arbitrary bitmap without being limited to the
> >>32-bits the xc_tbuf_set_cpu_mask_array can only do.
> >>
> >>We also add an macro which can be used by both libxc and
> >>xentrace.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>[v2: Use DIV_ROUND_UP macro as suggested by Daniel]
> >>[v3: Use 'int' for bits instead of 'unsigned int' as spotted by Boris]
> >
> >
> >Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Oh, sorry -- I meant to say: from what I can tell, at the moment xentrace is
> the only user of xc_tbuf_set_cpu_mask().  The libxc interface isn't stable:
> why not just leave the name xc_tbuf_set_cpu_mask() and just change the
> arguments?  (This would obviously involve merging patch 4 into this one as
> well.)

Done.
> 
>  -George
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel