[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/8] libxl: allow a generation ID to be specified at domain creation
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 13:09 +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > On 18/06/14 12:33, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 16:04 +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > >> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl > >> index f0f6e34..1c5e687 100644 > >> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl > >> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl > >> @@ -371,6 +371,8 @@ libxl_domain_build_info = Struct("domain_build_info",[ > >> ("xen_platform_pci", > >> libxl_defbool), > >> ("usbdevice_list", > >> libxl_string_list), > >> ("vendor_device", > >> libxl_vendor_device), > >> + # See libxl_ms_vm_genid_generate() > >> + ("ms_vm_genid", libxl_uuid), > > > > When we discussed this IRL I thought we had decided that this should be > > a new libxl_ms_vm_genid type, effectively a typedef of uint8_t[16], > > similar to libxl_mac and libxl_hwcap[[0]]. This would avoid any > > suggestion that one of the more structured forms of UUID would be > > appropriate here. > > I kept the libxl_uuid type in the end because it allowed me to use > libxl_uuid_is_nil() without having to re-implement an equivalent. Doesn't sound too tricky though. > > I appreciate that you tried to address that with the comment, but I fear > > it might not be terribly effective in practice... > > A toolstack author cannot use the ms_vm_genid field correctly without > reading the Microsoft document and that's clear on the requirements. What's not clear is that libxl_uuid_generate() doesn't (necessarily) meet the spec. Using a different type would stop people from using that. > Do you still want a new typedef? I think it would be best. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |