Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] mini-os: xenbus changes for rump kernels

[Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell, le Fri 27 Jun 2014 12:52:22 +0100, a écrit :
> On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 15:26 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] mini-os: xenbus 
> > changes for rump kernels"):
> > > On 20/06/14 20:04, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > ...
> > > > But before I ask the rump kernel developers to pull my nontrivial
> > > > changes, I felt I should give the Xen community a chance to object.
> > > > Hence this RFC series.
> > > 
> > > Are these changes indented for the Xen tree, or the rump fork tree?
> > 
> > These are for the rump fork tree
> 
> So for the purposes of having my committer hat on I should certainly
> ignore all these, right?

Yes, they aren't even meant to apply on the xen tree :)

> I take it you would at some point like some review though?

Well, I guess my Acked-by-s will propagate up to when they'll get back
submitted to the xen tree.

Samuel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel