Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] mini-os: xenbus changes for rump kernels

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 15:26 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] mini-os: xenbus 
> changes for rump kernels"):
> > On 20/06/14 20:04, Ian Jackson wrote:
> ...
> > > But before I ask the rump kernel developers to pull my nontrivial
> > > changes, I felt I should give the Xen community a chance to object.
> > > Hence this RFC series.
> > 
> > Are these changes indented for the Xen tree, or the rump fork tree?
> 
> These are for the rump fork tree

So for the purposes of having my committer hat on I should certainly
ignore all these, right?

I take it you would at some point like some review though?

I notice you aren't CCing and rumpkernels lists, was that deliberate?

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel