[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86/HVM: command line option adjustments



> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 11:31 PM
> 
> >>> On 30.07.14 at 18:55, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 07/30/2014 12:09 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> >> @@ -70,8 +70,10 @@
> >>
> >>   bool_t __read_mostly hvm_enabled;
> >>
> >> +#ifdef DBG_LEVEL_0
> >>   unsigned int opt_hvm_debug_level __read_mostly;
> >>   integer_param("hvm_debug", opt_hvm_debug_level);
> >> +#endif
> >
> >
> > Do you think "#ifndef NDEBUG" might be better given that it is what
> > defines DBG_LEVEL_0 (and all other DBG_LEVELs)?
> 
> No, specifically not: If someone wants to alter the behavior to e.g.
> include the option (and the effect it takes) in a non-debug build, the
> way it's done this requires code modification in _exactly one place_.
> 
> Jan

Acked-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.