[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: Fix handling packets on compound pages with skb_segment
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 18:29:34 +0100 > On 31/07/14 21:25, David Miller wrote: >> Secondly, for something like UDP you can't just split the packet up >> like this, or for any other datagram protocol for that matter. > The netback/netfront interface currently only supports TSO and > TSO6. That's why I did the pktgen TCP patch Do a sendfile() with MSG_MORE over UDP, I bet you can construct a sequence that violates your constraints too. It doesn't make sense to focus on TSO, it's a fundamental issue. Packets can come from anywhere, and you have to be prepared to generically handle a MAX_SKB_FRAGS loaded SKB with arbitrary start/end/length fragment configurations. > Currently netback limits each skb sent through to 18 slots, because it > has to map every grant ref to a frag. There was an idea to handle this > problem by removing this limit and let the backend coalesce the > scattered buffers into a brand new piece, but then the backend would > pay the price, and it would be huge as most of the packet should be > copied. 18 slots means that even with linearization the maximum SKB size you can support is 64K. (16 * 4096) == 64K, please one extra slot on each side for potential partial pages, gives us 18. > We haven't seen this problem very often, and it's also a bit hard to > reproduce (hence my frag offset-size pktgen patches), but we can't > afford the assumption that it won't happen very often. It's trivial to reproduce, I've already shown how one could trigger it _without_ TSO being involved at all. I'll state it again: Set TCP_CORK, or use MSG_MORE on the socket. Do a sequence of many 1 byte sendfile() requests over a file, skipping around the offset on every call in order to prevent coalescing. Clear TCP_CORK or MSG_MORE, you should see a MAX_SKB_FRAGS skb end up in the driver transmit function. > The main concept in this solution is that if it turns out the packet > needs too many slots in start_xmit, pretend that netfront is not GSO > capable, and fall back to the software segmentation, which will result > in packets which can fit. This is the fundamental issue with your solution. It is not a GSO problem. You therefore have to fully linearize the packet when you encounter this situation. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |