[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/1] xen:include:asm-x86:e820: just covert nr_map with unsigned int
>>> On 08.08.14 at 09:54, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2014/8/8 15:38, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 08.08.14 at 09:26, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 2014/8/8 15:15, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>>> On 08.08.14 at 09:00, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> This shouldn't ever be negative. >>>> >>>> This means nothing for the actual change, and makes me imply you did >>>> the change without checking it actually _is_ never negative in any of >>>> the uses. >>>> >>>> Also please cut down your patch title prefixes (not just here) to >>>> something reasonable. >>>> >>> >>> What about this? >>> >>> xen:e820map: just convert nr_map with unsigned int >> >> x86: make struct e820map's nr_map unsigned > > Okay. > >> >>> nr_map is used to represent the amount of e820entry in e820 so it >>> shouldn't be negative. >> >> You still say "shouldn't" instead of "isn't", making me still imply you >> didn't verify that fact. I.e. I'd be fine with a suitable variant of the > > Maybe I'm poor to describe that main point here. > > x86: make struct e820map's nr_map unsigned > > nr_map is used to represent the amount of e820entry in e820 so its > not always negative. "not always negative"? Based on your initial one, "This is never negative" would be fine, _provided you verified_ this to be the case. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |