[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V5 4/5] xen, libxc: Request page fault injection via libxc
- To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Andrei LUTAS <vlutas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 00:45:34 +0300
- Cc: kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx, ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx, ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Delivery-date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 21:45:57 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=bitdefender.com; b=f9VBbVmtjl44Ua5kN7w1Gk39Wb9YJg0vYF36Nmskfx9JR3QU/WOSrCA6MmE6/1BB4D4azpeCEofoNAJhfoARdM2HWOEg4iF/0ERv1R5AfR77U3Aa7s9PIpeotMP4VltTAZQ/B5yeA5ihGs/2/b8vtBKCsiOzyf8XT0tsVM+x0/qxebSxKczMy5AaN6l7XtFh7MIHV8ACqwSFtbArgw0K4/G1UZm5pTIqTNrEgOQmMvupwu6sUkJ5gf+egSQ8yh/acHPiEdfvOYnMVcO6HIRdd1JSBk263t0qLFSOCKRfslrGSAwroMjvw6SnYl0lw0WuiABVxi9R4mpOZu2/fusAyQ==; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-BitDefender-Scanner:X-BitDefender-Spam:X-BitDefender-SpamStamp:X-BitDefender-CF-Stamp;
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 8/8/2014 5:48 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Do you really mean to compare the full CR3 value here, rather than
just bits 12...51? In which case the address_space field likely would
better be a GPFN.
Hello,
That is a good point, with the additional observation that only bits
31..5 should be tested when in PAE mode and of course, 31..12 when
PAE and LM are both disabled.
Best regards,
Andrei.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
