Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 1/4] x86: Consolidate boolean inputs in hvm and p2m into a shared bitmap.

[Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/11/2014 10:48 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
index 76616ac..1f72e19 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -1394,7 +1394,7 @@ const struct hvm_function_table * __init start_svm(void)
 }
 
 static void svm_do_nested_pgfault(struct vcpu *v,
-    struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t npfec, paddr_t gpa)
+    struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t pfec, paddr_t gpa)


I am not sure I understand the reason behind this change. This *is* 
still a nested page fault error code, isn't it?
Was this to avoid name collision with npfec variable that is added below?

-boris


>   {
>       int ret;
>       unsigned long gfn = gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -1403,10 +1403,13 @@ static void svm_do_nested_pgfault(struct vcpu *v,
>       p2m_access_t p2ma;
>       struct p2m_domain *p2m = NULL;
>   
> -    ret = hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(gpa, 0, ~0ul,
> -                                    1, /* All NPFs count as reads */
> -                                    npfec & PFEC_write_access,
> -                                    npfec & PFEC_insn_fetch);
> +    struct npfec npfec = {
> +        .read_access = 1, /* All NPFs count as reads */
> +        .write_access = !!(pfec & PFEC_write_access),
> +        .insn_fetch = !!(pfec & PFEC_insn_fetch)
> +    };
> +
> +    ret = hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(gpa, ~0ul, npfec);

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel