[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen_hvc: no reason to write the type key on xenstore

To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:51:32 +0800
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dave Scott <Dave.Scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>, jslaby@xxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 02:52:51 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:32:48PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> CC'ing tty maintainers.

Why?  Is that how you submit a patch to be included to the kernel tree?
(hint, the answer is no, and also you should cc: the linux-serial
list...)

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen_hvc: no reason to write the type key on xenstore
  - From: Stefano Stabellini

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen_hvc: no reason to write the type key on xenstore
  - From: Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen_hvc: no reason to write the type key on xenstore
  - From: Stefano Stabellini

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [linux-next test] 29674: tolerable FAIL
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 10/10] libxl: set vnuma for domain
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen_hvc: no reason to write the type key on xenstore
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen_hvc: no reason to write the type key on xenstore
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.