Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: Fix smp_send_call_function_mask() for current CPU

[Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

(Forgot to add patches[at] apm [dot] com)

--
Anup

On 14 August 2014 17:17, Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The smp_send_call_function_mask() does not work on Foundation v8
> model with one CPU. The reason being gicv2_send_SGI() is called
> with irqmode==SGI_TARGET_LIST and *cpu_mask=0x1 on CPU0 which
> does not work on Foundation v8 model.
>
> Further, it is really strange that smp_send_call_function_mask()
> depends on GIC SGIs for calling function on current CPU.
>
> This patch fixes smp_send_call_function_mask() for current CPU
> by directly calling smp_call_function_interrupt() on current CPU.
> This is very similar to what Xen x86 does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  xen/arch/arm/smp.c |    7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/smp.c b/xen/arch/arm/smp.c
> index 30203b8..4fde3f9 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/smp.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/smp.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,13 @@ void smp_send_event_check_mask(const cpumask_t *mask)
>  void smp_send_call_function_mask(const cpumask_t *mask)
>  {
>      send_SGI_mask(mask, GIC_SGI_CALL_FUNCTION);
> +
> +    if ( cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mask) )
> +    {
> +        local_irq_disable();
> +        smp_call_function_interrupt();
> +        local_irq_enable();
> +    }
>  }
>
>  /*
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel