[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][v3][PATCH 3/6] tools:firmware:hvmloader: reserve RMRR mappings in e820
On 15/08/14 09:27, Tiejun Chen wrote: > We need to reserve all RMRR mappings in e820 to avoid any > potential guest memory conflict. > > Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c | 94 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h | 6 +++ > tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c | 16 +++++++ > tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h | 2 + > 4 files changed, 118 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c > index 2e05e93..7f54eab 100644 > --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c > +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c > @@ -68,12 +68,89 @@ void dump_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820, unsigned int > nr) > } > } Please apply Xen coding style to all of this file - there are a lot of errors. > > +static unsigned int construct_rmrr_e820_maps(unsigned int nr, > + struct rmrr_map *e820_rmrr_map, > + struct e820entry *e820) > +{ > + unsigned int i = 0, j = 0, m = 0, sum_nr = 0; > + uint64_t start, end, rmrr_start, rmrr_end; > + unsigned int insert = 0, do_insert = 0; > + > +do_real_construct: > + sum_nr = nr + e820_rmrr_map->nr_map; > + for ( i = 0; i < e820_rmrr_map->nr_map; i++ ) > + { > + rmrr_start = e820_rmrr_map->map[i].addr; > + rmrr_end = e820_rmrr_map->map[i].addr + > + e820_rmrr_map->map[i].size + 1; > + > + for ( j = 0; j < nr; j++ ) > + { > + end = e820[j].addr + e820[j].size; > + start = e820[j+1].addr; > + > + /* Between those existing e820 entries. */ > + if ( (rmrr_start > end) && (rmrr_end < start) ) > + { > + if (do_insert) > + { > + /* Move to free this entry. */ > + for ( m = sum_nr - 1; m > j; m-- ) > + { > + e820[m].addr = e820[m-1].addr; > + e820[m].size = e820[m-1].size; > + e820[m].type = e820[m-1].type; > + } > + > + /* Then fill RMRR into that entry. */ > + e820[j+1].addr = rmrr_start; > + e820[j+1].size = rmrr_end - rmrr_start; > + e820[j+1].type = E820_RESERVED; > + nr++; > + } > + insert++; > + } > + /* Already at the end. */ > + else if ( (rmrr_start > end) && !start ) > + { > + if (do_insert) > + { > + e820[nr].addr = rmrr_start; > + e820[nr].size = rmrr_end - rmrr_start; > + e820[nr].type = E820_RESERVED; > + nr++; > + } > + insert++; > + } > + } > + } > + > + /* Just return if done. */ > + if (do_insert) > + return nr; > + > + /* Fine to construct RMRR mappings into e820. */ > + if ( insert == e820_rmrr_map->nr_map) > + { > + do_insert = 1; > + goto do_real_construct; > + } > + /* Overlap. */ > + else > + { > + printf("RMRR overlap with thoese existing e820 entries!\n"); > + printf("So we don't construct RMRR mapping in e820!\n"); > + } > + > + return nr; > +} > /* Create an E820 table based on memory parameters provided in hvm_info. */ > int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820, > unsigned int lowmem_reserved_base, > unsigned int bios_image_base) > { > unsigned int nr = 0; > + struct rmrr_map *rmrr_maps; > > if ( !lowmem_reserved_base ) > lowmem_reserved_base = 0xA0000; > @@ -169,6 +246,23 @@ int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820, > nr++; > } > > + /* We'd better reserve RMRR mapping for each VM to avoid potential > + * memory conflict. > + */ > + rmrr_maps = get_rmrr_map_info(); > + if ( rmrr_maps->nr_map ) > + { > + if ( (nr + rmrr_maps->nr_map) > E820MAX ) > + { > + printf(" No free space to insert all RMRR mapping entry!!\n"); > + return nr; > + } > + else > + { > + nr = construct_rmrr_e820_maps(nr, rmrr_maps, e820); > + } > + } > + > return nr; > } > > diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h > index b2ead7f..a61b80b 100644 > --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h > +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.h > @@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ struct e820entry { > uint32_t type; > } __attribute__((packed)); > > +#define E820MAX 128 > + > +struct rmrr_map { > + unsigned int nr_map; > + struct e820entry map[E820MAX]; > +}; > #endif /* __HVMLOADER_E820_H__ */ > > /* > diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c > index 80d822f..f63434a 100644 > --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c > +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c > @@ -766,6 +766,22 @@ struct shared_info *get_shared_info(void) > return shared_info; > } > > +struct rmrr_map *get_rmrr_map_info(void) > +{ > + static int no_rmrr = 1; > + > + if ( no_rmrr == 0 ) > + return &rmrr_e820map; > + > + if ( hypercall_memory_op(XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map, > + &rmrr_e820map) != 0 ) This *only* works because you are not passing a xen_rmrr_memory_map_t as per the hypercall definition, and Xen is clobbering your heap in a way which matches the hvmloader layout. > + BUG(); > + > + no_rmrr = 0; > + > + return &rmrr_e820map; > +} > + > uint16_t get_cpu_mhz(void) > { > struct shared_info *shared_info = get_shared_info(); > diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h > index a70e4aa..5f48a86 100644 > --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h > +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h > @@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ unsigned long create_pir_tables(void); > void smp_initialise(void); > > #include "e820.h" > +struct rmrr_map rmrr_e820map; Unless I am mistaken, this will put an rmrr_map object named rmrr_e820map in each translation unit which includes util.h I suspect it is not what you actually want to do. ~Andrew > +struct rmrr_map *get_rmrr_map_info(void); > int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820, > unsigned int lowmem_reserved_base, > unsigned int bios_image_base); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |