[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND v7] libxl: vnuma topology configuration parser and doc
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 01:10:29AM -0400, Elena Ufimtseva wrote: > Parses vnuma topoplogy number of nodes and memory > ranges. If not defined, initializes vnuma with > only one node and default topology. This one node covers > all domain memory and all vcpus assigned to it. .. snip.. > +/* > + * init vNUMA to "zero config" with one node and all other > + * topology parameters set to default. > + */ > +static int vnuma_default_config(libxl_domain_build_info *b_info) > +{ > + b_info->vnodes = 1; > + /* all memory goes to this one vnode, as well as vcpus. */ > + if (!(b_info->vnuma_mem = (uint64_t *)calloc(b_info->vnodes, > + sizeof(*b_info->vnuma_mem)))) > + goto bad_vnumazerocfg; > + > + if (!(b_info->vnuma_vcpumap = (unsigned int *)calloc(b_info->max_vcpus, > + sizeof(*b_info->vnuma_vcpumap)))) > + goto bad_vnumazerocfg; > + > + if (!(b_info->vdistance = (unsigned int *)calloc(b_info->vnodes * > + b_info->vnodes, sizeof(*b_info->vdistance)))) > + goto bad_vnumazerocfg; > + > + if (!(b_info->vnuma_vnodemap = (unsigned int *)calloc(b_info->vnodes, > + sizeof(*b_info->vnuma_vnodemap)))) > + goto bad_vnumazerocfg; > + > + b_info->vnuma_mem[0] = b_info->max_memkb >> 10; > + > + /* all vcpus assigned to this vnode. */ > + vcputovnode_default(b_info->vnuma_vcpumap, b_info->vnodes, > + b_info->max_vcpus); > + > + /* default vdistance is 10. */ > + vdistance_set(b_info->vdistance, b_info->vnodes, 10, 10); > + > + /* VNUMA_NO_NODE for vnode_to_pnode. */ > + vnuma_vnodemap_default(b_info->vnuma_vnodemap, b_info->vnodes); > + > + /* > + * will be placed to some physical nodes defined by automatic > + * numa placement or VNUMA_NO_NODE will not request exact node. > + */ > + libxl_defbool_set(&b_info->vnuma_autoplacement, true); > + return 0; > + > + bad_vnumazerocfg: I know that the caller ends up calling free_vnuma_info if this fails, but my impression is that we should do it here, as in: free_vnuma_info(&b_info); However it is up to the maintainer (Ian) to weigh in which way he would like it done. > + return -1; > +} > + > +static void free_vnuma_info(libxl_domain_build_info *b_info) > +{ > + free(b_info->vnuma_mem); > + free(b_info->vdistance); > + free(b_info->vnuma_vcpumap); > + free(b_info->vnuma_vnodemap); I think you need to set b_info->vnuma_mem = NULL; b_info->vdistance = NULL; .. and so on. This is more of future proofing the code in case somebody in the future adds this inadvertly: if (b_info->vnuma_mem) .. blah without first checking for 'if (b_info->vnodes)'. It has tripped me in the Linux kernel with the 'unbind' and 'bind' on SysFs with drivers forgetting to set their internal states to NULL and we crash. > + b_info->vnodes = 0; > +} > + > +static int parse_vnuma_mem(XLU_Config *config, > + libxl_domain_build_info **b_info) > +{ > + libxl_domain_build_info *dst; > + XLU_ConfigList *vnumamemcfg; > + int nr_vnuma_regions, i; > + unsigned long long vnuma_memparsed = 0; > + unsigned long ul; > + const char *buf; > + > + dst = *b_info; > + if (!xlu_cfg_get_list(config, "vnuma_mem", > + &vnumamemcfg, &nr_vnuma_regions, 0)) { > + > + if (nr_vnuma_regions != dst->vnodes) { > + fprintf(stderr, "Number of numa regions (vnumamem = %d) is \ > + incorrect (should be %d).\n", nr_vnuma_regions, > + dst->vnodes); > + goto bad_vnuma_mem; > + } > + > + dst->vnuma_mem = calloc(dst->vnodes, > + sizeof(*dst->vnuma_mem)); > + if (dst->vnuma_mem == NULL) { > + fprintf(stderr, "Unable to allocate memory for vnuma ranges.\n"); > + goto bad_vnuma_mem; > + } > + > + char *ep; I am surprised the compiler didn't throw a fit! This is usually done at the start of the function or the '{ }' block. Please move it there. > + /* > + * Will parse only nr_vnodes times, even if we have more/less > regions. > + * Take care of it later if less or discard if too many regions. > + */ > + for (i = 0; i < dst->vnodes; i++) { > + buf = xlu_cfg_get_listitem(vnumamemcfg, i); > + if (!buf) { > + fprintf(stderr, > + "xl: Unable to get element %d in vnuma memory > list.\n", i); You also need to free dst->vnuma_mem before you do the 'goto'. > + goto bad_vnuma_mem; > + } > + > + ul = strtoul(buf, &ep, 10); > + if (ep == buf) { > + fprintf(stderr, "xl: Invalid argument parsing vnumamem: > %s.\n", buf); Ditto. > + goto bad_vnuma_mem; > + } > + > + /* 32Mb is a min size for a node, taken from Linux */ I thought it was 64? Or perhaps I forgot it? Could you give a pointer to where this was defined in Linux? Say (taken from Linux - see arch/x86/blahbla/bla.c). > + if (ul >= UINT32_MAX || ul < MIN_VNODE_SIZE) { > + fprintf(stderr, "xl: vnuma memory %lu is not within %u - %u > range.\n", > + ul, MIN_VNODE_SIZE, UINT32_MAX); free(dst->vnuma_mem); before you jump. Or you can have in the bad_vnuma_mem: free(dst->vnuma_mem); dst->vnuma_mem = NULL; > + goto bad_vnuma_mem; > + } > + > + /* memory in MBytes */ > + dst->vnuma_mem[i] = ul; > + } > + > + /* Total memory for vNUMA parsed to verify */ > + for (i = 0; i < nr_vnuma_regions; i++) > + vnuma_memparsed = vnuma_memparsed + (dst->vnuma_mem[i]); > + > + /* Amount of memory for vnodes same as total? */ > + if ((vnuma_memparsed << 10) != (dst->max_memkb)) { > + fprintf(stderr, "xl: vnuma memory is not the same as domain \ > + memory size.\n"); > + goto bad_vnuma_mem; Again, either free it or the label is responsible for it. > + } > + } else { > + dst->vnuma_mem = calloc(dst->vnodes, > + sizeof(*dst->vnuma_mem)); > + if (dst->vnuma_mem == NULL) { > + fprintf(stderr, "Unable to allocate memory for vnuma ranges.\n"); > + goto bad_vnuma_mem; > + } > + > + fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: vNUMA memory ranges were not > specified.\n"); > + fprintf(stderr, "Using default equal vnode memory size %lu Kbytes \ > + to cover %lu Kbytes.\n", > + dst->max_memkb / dst->vnodes, dst->max_memkb); > + > + if (split_vnumamem(dst) < 0) { > + fprintf(stderr, "Could not split vnuma memory into equal > chunks.\n"); Guess what I am going to say :-) > + goto bad_vnuma_mem; > + } > + } > + return 0; > + > + bad_vnuma_mem: > + return -1; > +} > + > +static int parse_vnuma_distance(XLU_Config *config, > + libxl_domain_build_info **b_info) > +{ > + libxl_domain_build_info *dst; > + XLU_ConfigList *vdistancecfg; > + int nr_vdist; > + > + dst = *b_info; > + dst->vdistance = calloc(dst->vnodes * dst->vnodes, > + sizeof(*dst->vdistance)); > + if (dst->vdistance == NULL) > + goto bad_distance; > + > + if (!xlu_cfg_get_list(config, "vdistance", &vdistancecfg, &nr_vdist, 0)) > { > + int d1, d2, i; > + /* > + * First value is the same node distance, the second as the > + * rest of distances. The following is required right now to > + * avoid non-symmetrical distance table as it may break latest > kernel. > + * TODO: Better way to analyze extended distance table, possibly > + * OS specific. > + */ > + > + for (i = 0; i < nr_vdist; i++) { > + d1 = get_list_item_uint(vdistancecfg, i); > + } > + > + d1 = get_list_item_uint(vdistancecfg, 0); > + if (dst->vnodes > 1) > + d2 = get_list_item_uint(vdistancecfg, 1); > + else > + d2 = d1; > + > + if (d1 >= 0 && d2 >= 0) { > + if (d1 < d2) > + fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: vnuma distance d1 < d2, %u < > %u\n", d1, d2); > + vdistance_set(dst->vdistance, dst->vnodes, d1, d2); > + } else { > + fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: vnuma distance values are > incorrect.\n"); > + goto bad_distance; free dst->vdistance first. > + } > + } else { > + fprintf(stderr, "Could not parse vnuma distances.\n"); > + vdistance_set(dst->vdistance, dst->vnodes, 10, 20); > + } > + return 0; > + > + bad_distance: > + return -1; > +} > + > +static int parse_vnuma_vcpumap(XLU_Config *config, > + libxl_domain_build_info **b_info) > +{ > + libxl_domain_build_info *dst; > + XLU_ConfigList *vcpumap; > + int nr_vcpumap, i; > + > + dst = *b_info; > + dst->vnuma_vcpumap = (unsigned int *)calloc(dst->max_vcpus, > + sizeof(*dst->vnuma_vcpumap)); > + if (dst->vnuma_vcpumap == NULL) > + goto bad_vcpumap; > + > + if (!xlu_cfg_get_list(config, "vnuma_vcpumap", > + &vcpumap, &nr_vcpumap, 0)) { > + if (nr_vcpumap == dst->max_vcpus) { > + unsigned int vnode, vcpumask = 0, vmask; An newline here please. > + vmask = ~(~0 << nr_vcpumap); > + for (i = 0; i < nr_vcpumap; i++) { > + vnode = get_list_item_uint(vcpumap, i); > + if (vnode >= 0 && vnode < dst->vnodes) { > + vcpumask |= (1 << i); There is an extra space there. > + dst->vnuma_vcpumap[i] = vnode; > + } > + } > + > + /* Did it covered all vnodes in the vcpu mask? */ > + if ( !(((vmask & vcpumask) + 1) == (1 << nr_vcpumap)) ) { > + fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: Not all vnodes were covered \ > + in numa_cpumask.\n"); Either free it here or the label has to clear it. > + goto bad_vcpumap; > + } > + } else { > + fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: Bad vnuma_vcpumap.\n"); > + goto bad_vcpumap; > + } > + } > + else > + vcputovnode_default(dst->vnuma_vcpumap, > + dst->vnodes, > + dst->max_vcpus); > + return 0; > + > + bad_vcpumap: > + return -1; > +} > + > +static int parse_vnuma_vnodemap(XLU_Config *config, > + libxl_domain_build_info **b_info) > +{ > + libxl_domain_build_info *dst; > + XLU_ConfigList *vnodemap; > + int nr_vnodemap, i; > + > + dst = *b_info; > + > + /* There is mapping to NUMA physical nodes? */ > + dst->vnuma_vnodemap = (unsigned int *)calloc(dst->vnodes, > + sizeof(*dst->vnuma_vnodemap)); > + if (dst->vnuma_vnodemap == NULL) > + goto bad_vnodemap; > + if (!xlu_cfg_get_list(config, "vnuma_vnodemap",&vnodemap, > + &nr_vnodemap, 0)) { something is off. It doesn't need to be so far off. The &nr_vnodemap can be aligned with the first parameter. > + /* > + * If not specified or incorred, will be defined s/incorred/incorrect/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |