Re: [Xen-devel] [v5][PATCH 03/10] xen:x86: define a new hypercall to get RMRR mappings

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 26.08.14 at 14:02, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 26/08/14 12:02, Tiejun Chen wrote:
>> +    case XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map:
>> +    {
>> +        struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_map map;
>> +        XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t) buffer;
>> +        XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mem_reserved_device_memory_t) 
>> buffer_param;
>> +        unsigned int i = 0;
>> +        static struct xen_mem_reserved_device_memory rmrr_map;
> 
> This absolutely must not be static, as I have indicated twice before. 

Indeed, you should be reading what you're being told, and not
submit new patch versions without having addressed (by altering
the patch or addressing the comment verbally) previous comments.
For example, I had also asked you to adjust your patch titles, yet
they still come in the same bogus form (namely with colons rather
than slashes as prefix separators - this ones should e.g. start with
"xen/x86:", albeit I personally dislike the xen/ prefix and tend to
strip it).

It is for that reason that I didn't comment on the last two or so
iterations of your patch series - the effort the repeated pointing
out of issues causes just makes it sit at the very end of the list of
things needing looking at).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel