[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V5 5/5] add xen pvscsi maintainer
On 08/26/2014 07:12 PM, David Vrabel wrote: On 26/08/14 17:37, James Bottomley wrote:On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 16:23 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:On 08/26/2014 04:14 PM, David Vrabel wrote:On 18/08/14 10:31, jgross@xxxxxxxx wrote:From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> Add myself as maintainer for the Xen pvSCSI stuff. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> --- MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index aefa948..360f86f 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -10086,6 +10086,14 @@ S: Supported F: drivers/block/xen-blkback/* F: drivers/block/xen* +XEN PVSCSI DRIVERS +M: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> +L: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers)You should add the appropriate scsi list here (linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I presume?)Really? Xen PCI and Xen Block susbsystems don't have an according entry. James, do you have an opinion here? I don't mind adding linux-scsi, but I think the Xen list is the appropriate one for pvSCSI.It depends how you want to handle this, but the patches have to come on to the SCSI list somehow. You can have them directly posted by adding the list, or you can repost them yourselves. It's a question of workflow.I think these drivers have had (and will continue to have) the most useful review from scsi people. I think posting directly (hence earlier) to linux-scsi will ensure the best quality. This is the workflow used for the Xen network drivers and I think it works well. Okay, I'll add the scsi list. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |