[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] IPI sending difference between x86 and ARM



On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 11:10 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 10.09.14 at 12:01, <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Anyway, if smp_send_event_check_mask is supposed to exclude the calling
> > CPU then we should fix that on ARM in the name of consistency/sanity. In
> > the event it causes other issues then we should fix those as they arise.
> 
> Actually I was instead considering to filter the local CPU in
> cpumask_raise_softirq(), just like cpu_raise_softirq() does. That
> would make changes to smp_send_event_check_mask()
> unnecessary.

Sure, that would be fine and good too.

But independent of that I think smp_send_event_check_mask() should
behave the same on x86 as ARM wrt including the current CPU.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.