[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [v6][PATCH 2/7] tools/libxc: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map
On 2014/9/11 23:21, Jan Beulich wrote: On 10.09.14 at 07:49, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:+ if ( errno == ENOBUFS ) + *max_entries = memmap.nr_entries; + + return rc ? -errno : memmap.nr_entries; +}Isn't libxc generally aiming at using POSIX style return values, i.e. -1 one error with errno indicating the details? Furthermore you're even inconsistent with yourself, as you return -1 in an earlier error path. tools/libxc/xc_domain.c: int xc_get_machine_memory_map(xc_interface *xch, struct e820entry entries[], uint32_t max_entries) { int rc; struct xen_memory_map memmap = { .nr_entries = max_entries };DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BOUNCE(entries, sizeof(struct e820entry) * max_entries, XC_HYPERCALL_BUFFER_BOUNCE_OUT);if ( !entries || xc_hypercall_bounce_pre(xch, entries) || max_entries <= 1) return -1; set_xen_guest_handle(memmap.buffer, entries);rc = do_memory_op(xch, XENMEM_machine_memory_map, &memmap, sizeof(memmap)); xc_hypercall_bounce_post(xch, entries); return rc ? rc : memmap.nr_entries; } Here I just change last line as follows: return rc ? -errno : memmap.nr_entries;Because if I don't return '-errno', how will the caller know the detailed error? rc = xc_reserved_device_memory_map(xch, xmrdm, &nr_entries); if ( rc < 0 ) { /* DRM doesn't exist. */ if ( rc == -ENOENT ) rc = 0; Or are you saying we should use errno ditectly, + + rc = xc_reserved_device_memory_map(xch, xmrdm, &nr_entries); + if (rc < 0 ) { + switch (errno) { + case ENOENT: /* RDM doesn't exist. */ Right? Thanks Tiejun _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |