|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [v6][PATCH 2/7] tools/libxc: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map
On 2014/9/11 23:21, Jan Beulich wrote: On 10.09.14 at 07:49, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:+ if ( errno == ENOBUFS ) + *max_entries = memmap.nr_entries; + + return rc ? -errno : memmap.nr_entries; +}Isn't libxc generally aiming at using POSIX style return values, i.e. -1 one error with errno indicating the details? Furthermore you're even inconsistent with yourself, as you return -1 in an earlier error path.
tools/libxc/xc_domain.c:
int xc_get_machine_memory_map(xc_interface *xch,
struct e820entry entries[],
uint32_t max_entries)
{
int rc;
struct xen_memory_map memmap = {
.nr_entries = max_entries
};
DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BOUNCE(entries, sizeof(struct e820entry) *
max_entries,
XC_HYPERCALL_BUFFER_BOUNCE_OUT);
if ( !entries || xc_hypercall_bounce_pre(xch, entries) ||
max_entries <= 1)
return -1;
set_xen_guest_handle(memmap.buffer, entries);
rc = do_memory_op(xch, XENMEM_machine_memory_map, &memmap,
sizeof(memmap));
xc_hypercall_bounce_post(xch, entries);
return rc ? rc : memmap.nr_entries;
}
Here I just change last line as follows:
return rc ? -errno : memmap.nr_entries;
Because if I don't return '-errno', how will the caller know the
detailed error?
rc = xc_reserved_device_memory_map(xch, xmrdm, &nr_entries);
if ( rc < 0 )
{
/* DRM doesn't exist. */
if ( rc == -ENOENT )
rc = 0;
Or are you saying we should use errno ditectly,
+
+ rc = xc_reserved_device_memory_map(xch, xmrdm, &nr_entries);
+ if (rc < 0 ) {
+ switch (errno) {
+ case ENOENT: /* RDM doesn't exist. */
Right?
Thanks
Tiejun
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |