[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 11/20] x86/VPMU: Interface for setting PMU mode and flags
> From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 12:29 PM > > Add runtime interface for setting PMU mode and flags. Three main modes are > provided: > * XENPMU_MODE_OFF: PMU is not virtualized > * XENPMU_MODE_SELF: Guests can access PMU MSRs and receive PMU > interrupts. > * XENPMU_MODE_HV: Same as XENPMU_MODE_SELF for non-proviledged > guests, dom0 > can profile itself and the hypervisor. > > Note that PMU modes are different from what can be provided at Xen's boot > line > with 'vpmu' argument. An 'off' (or '0') value is equivalent to > XENPMU_MODE_OFF. > Any other value, on the other hand, will cause VPMU mode to be set to > XENPMU_MODE_SELF during boot. > > For feature flags only Intel's BTS is currently supported. > > Mode and flags are set via HYPERVISOR_xenpmu_op hypercall. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> In general it's OK to me: Acked-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> Just a small comment: > +static void vpmu_sched_checkin(unsigned long unused) > +{ > + atomic_inc(&vpmu_sched_counter); > +} > + > +static int vpmu_force_context_switch(void) > +{ > + unsigned i, j, allbutself_num, mycpu; > + static s_time_t start, now; any reason of such static variables when there's no continuation any more? Thanks Kevin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |